God itself says that if Adam eats from the Tree of Knowledge of Good & Evil, "thou shalt surely die" on the very same day, using the Hebrew mût tamût that specifically means physical death and yôm which does just mean an ordinary day (Gen 2:16-17, Gen 3:2-3). The serpent says it's untrue: actually they will attain knowledge of good and evil (Gen 3:4-5). Adam and Eve, who were already mortal (Gen 3:22-23), ate from the tree and didn't die. They lived on to parent all of humanity. God in Gen. 3:22 admits that Adam and Eve did indeed "become as one of us, to know good and evil". God lied, and Satan told the truth.
2026-06-03
In Eden, God Lied and the Snake Spoke Truth
2026-03-08
God Has No Free Will (Four Arguments)
- If God is perfect, then, it always follows the best course of action and therefore never has a choice.
- A benevolent God always chooses the path that causes most good, so, never has a choice.
- An all-knowing god knows with certainty all of its future actions. As its knowledge cannot be wrong, then, it must follow this instantaneously predetermined path, and has never had a moment of existence in which this wasn't the case.
- A perfect being that created time never changes (any new state implies that the previous state was less good); a being that never changes isn't making choices. This makes sense for a being that is outside of space-time.
Without free will, God cannot be moral, and must be neutral (amoral).
One final irony is that if God created free will, then, it had no choice in doing so. If free will wasn't created by God, then, God is not the Creator. If it was, then, #Creator:at the moment when it created free will, the concept did not exist, and therefore, God itself did not have free will in doing so.
2026-03-01
Knowledge
"Knowledge" by Vexen Crabtree (2026)
The contents menu is:
2026-02-28
Human Religions website
2026-02-18
Hindu Violent Extremism Against Christians in India: The Continuing Legacy of the BJP
2026-02-16
Psalm 23
2026-02-14
The Old Testament Book of Habakkuk
After a long series of prophets promise again and again that god is going to punish the Hebrews' neighbours for their unbelief, the reality of history is that the Chaldeans, after conquering Babylon, continued to spread. In terms of the Hebrews' understanding of their place in God's world, this simply made no sense. This story explains that God empowers the violent, expansionist and immoral Chaldeans, and that God (for no particularly good reason) boosts them against the Hebrews, causing the Chaldeans to occupy and ransack southern Judah.
Habakkuk tries to explain that God is choosing the Chaldeans to damage Judah on purpose, but struggles to find a coherent ethical reason why such bloodshed and violence can be endorsed by a good god, as a collective punishment - especially when the Chaldeans were infamously immoral and ought to be the ones being corrected. It is hard to see what morals or teachings there are in these wars between the Hebrews and their neighbours other than that it pays to be on the winning side, whether or not the winners are Jehovah-fearers.
The contents of "The Book of Habakkuk by Vexen Crabtree (2012) is:
